It has way less power consumption than the 9900k at full load, something a lot of people overlook. Powered by Invision Community, 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB, https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/amd-ryzen-9-3900x-review/, We're looking for volunteers to help build and maintain the forum. It has way less power consumption than the 9900k at full load, something a lot of people overlook. The 9900k competes against the 3700x. [FULL GUIDE 2020]. -If you do game most of the time, then don't bother with either. This review today, shows 3900x surpassed the 9900k on all accounts.https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/amd-ryzen-9-3900x-review/. colonel_mortis During testing of the two processors and three graphics cards, the Phoronix Test Suite was monitoring the AC power consumption of the overall system in real-time via a WattsUp Pro power meter. MSI really hit the nail on the head investing in Biosflashback on most of their B450 boards. 35 replies. -If you do a mix of both gaming and productivity, then a 3700x is still a good choice because of how cheap it is. If you are undecided between these two chips then I believe you do have a 500$ CPU budget!? The Ryzen 9 3900X seems to have a difficult time staying in stock at US retailers but most online listings are pegging it currently at $511~540 USD for its 12 cores / 24 threads, 3.8GHz base frequency, and 4.6GHz turbo frequency for this 105 Watt part. Posted in Graphics Cards, By

Core i9-9900K comparison details and find out what component will best suit your PC. Check out Ryzen 9 3900X vs. Ryzen 9 3900x vs i9-9900k. and you dont really have to worry about cooling the darn things. Those can persist as new bugs are present later on, in which AMD’s processors are typically stronger against such exploits. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent to our Privacy Policy and Cookies Policy.

If Intel beats AMD with few fps, it's nothing compared to so much more additional cores. Intel’s onboard-graphics-free choice, the 9900KF, is priced as much as $480, which is still greater than AMD’s processor – at least for today. I currently have the money for a much needed CPU upgrade, and the new Ryzen 9 3900x came out today with rather good reviews. You can also contribute to Phoronix through a PayPal tip. So for gaming you can keep the 3900 for 8 to 9 years, but the 9900k for the 4-5 years. That is where the marginally marketing-driven TDP figure stems from. I tend have a bunch of other things running in the background when I game so I'm hoping more cores will help out in that regard. Do you happen to know which models it applies to? I went with the 3900X just for the extra cores. Buying a 3700X with a X570 makes little sense (cheap CPU with expensive mobo) unless you really need the added features (PCI-E 4). But my intentions are focused on playing games with my rig, where the i9-9900k (and i7-8700k) is beating out the 3900x consistently (minimally). Seems to me that your response, a little like mine is based on knowing Intel and not knowing AMD. The operating system in use was Ubuntu 19.04 with the Linux 5.3 kernel while the NVIDIA driver was their newest 435.17 beta driver and on the AMD side was Mesa 19.2-devel built against LLVM 9.0 SVN. Posted in Air Cooling, Linus Media Group The differences are minimal as you point out and unless you want 1080p240hz (you shouldn't since it's gimmick) the obvious choice is the Ryzen 7 3700X or 3800X. I'm also more familiar with Intel than AMD platform, but if it out performs at half the price. 3900x + B450 Tomahawk is a real piece of kit right now.

Research into electricity requirements from Intel’s 9900K about its launching revealed it drawing a lot more energy than its TDP score. Keep reading! It is your ideal option if it is possible to leverage those additional cores for no excess cash. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Vs RTX 2080 – What Should You Get? That's what ThinkComputers said in his review basically, may just have to buy it if the cores really make up for it.

This is simply a mean of the outcomes on every product’s first page, whether used or new. One of the first consumer CPUs to support PCI Express 4.0. -If you do a mix of both gaming and productivity, then a 3700x is still a good choice because of how cheap it is.

Discussion. Charling

The Ryzen 9 3900X vs. Discussion. In the top end, for approximately $500, we’ve got the Corei9-9900k vs ryzen 9 3900x. Any feedback or advice is greatly appreciated, sorry if I respond late and thank you in advance if I personally forget to do so! Ryzen 9 3900x vs i9-9900k. Phoronix Premium allows ad-free access to the site, multi-page articles on a single page, and other features while supporting this site's continued operations. The mission at Phoronix since 2004 has centered around enriching the Linux hardware experience.

But if you do have the budget then for all means just go with the monster 3900x. Like Linus just said, if you do anything else with your PC... Not to talk about the fact that getting a 3900x or a 9900k won't benefit you in games vs. the step down model. I just did a price comparison excersise on the 9900k and 3700x for mb and cpu the difference was negligible (within £10), seems suppliers are already reacting and slashing the price of the intel chips. If you are undecided between these two chips then I believe you do have a 500$ CPU budget!? With the new hardware hand, you will find fantastic comparisons for us to create throughout the brand new assortment of Ryzen processors.