Other releases from the company aren’t necessarily massive, but the size here is impressively small. All available right now in the beta store. Ubiquiti is expanding its line of prosumer networking gear today with the debut of its latest access point. It is a convenient and easy way to get into the UniFi ecosystem. The more you angle away from the upstairs access point, the more floor joists and solid wood will be blocking your signal. Engineered to take advantage of 802.11ac Wave 2, the UniFi nanoHDprovides powerful multi-user support in an elegant, nano-sized design. The solution was 3 separate access points, mounted centrally on the ceiling of each level. But throw in weather-resistance, and there’s even more to like here. They can be mounted on the wall but you'll lose a lot of range in doing so. I know the nanoHD is for wall mounting unlike the flexHD and that the hardware is mostly (!) Now available for purchase, the new release is centered around a compact, water-resistant design with 802.11ac Wave 2 technology. Press J to jump to the feed. All, an update on this. I’d use the FlexHD on a wall or table in the center of an area if possible. Anyone that has both? Those are all pretty standard these days, but with Wi-Fi 6 now on the rise, there’s still room for improvement. See the UniFi - UDM/UCK: How to Reset the UniFi Controller to Factory Defaults help center article for more information on resetting the UniFi Dream Machine (UDM/UDM-Pro), and UniFi Cloud Key models (UCK-G2, UCK-G2-PLUS, UC-CK).

If you don't need the access point to be mounted on the ceiling then get the FlexHD. This is an unofficial community-led place to discuss all of Ubiquiti's products, such as the EdgeRouter, UniFi, AirFiber, etc. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Where Best = around 260Mbps. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Real-World Performance The UniFi nanoHD AP is the UniFi 802.11ac Wave 2 AP with the smallest form factor. Question for the group. Listing off the specs from the UniFi FlexHD, you’ll find it compares quite similarly to the existing nanoHD access point. The recommendation I found for the nanoHD is one per floor.

AmpliFi vs. UniFi Comparison On May 15th 2020, Ubiquiti added their first Wi-Fi 6 access point to the UniFi line, the U6-Lite-US. The ac-pro has the better rates at 2.4Ghz but slower at 5Ghz. The access point we are using is the UniFi nanoHD; a wave 2 4x4 802.11ac solution. Thanks! I've found the signal is stronger the direction of the logo (so less to the sides) when mounted on a ceiling, with much less signal to the rear (cardioid shaped). Do you think we would get much benefit from the mu-mimo of the nano-hd or go for the ac-pro?

Performance by the access point remains the same, but walking a few feet away and penetration through stucco is far superior having the Flex mounted table top.

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War multiplayer beta review, Illuminate your yard with a 4-pack of outdoor solar LED lights for $5 each, LG’s 34-inch 1440p UltraWide monitor sports HDR10, more at $399 (Reg. To answer your question about which device to use, I would go with the nanoHD if you can easily ceiling mount, and only go for the flexHD if that isn't an option or you just like the way it looks sitting on your table.

What would be the best mesh WiFi system », Public Beta for SpaceX Internet Will Start Soon; Buying Verizon 5G Home Even Harder Than Finding 5G Signal; + more news, Rising Broadband Demands May Reshape US Telecom; 20 Million U.S. Broadband Complaints Unresolved Last Year; + more news, Pai Rips Net Dereg Criticism As 'Frightening Nonsense'; FCC To Vote On Rural Broadband Funding Framework; + more news, T-Mobile Expands LTE To Rural Areas Recently 'Abandoned' By AT&T; Comcast Tests Symmetrical 1.25 Gbps; + more news, Group Introduces A Global Privacy Standard; COVID-19 Slams Cable Next-Gen Network Upgrades; + more news. I'm also assuming the Flex can perform as a standard AP when connected to the switch vs a mesh network. A water-resistance housing means that you’ll be able to install the FlexHD indoors or out.

I was willing to do this anyways, but then the early access UAP FlexHD was released. I went with the FlexHD because one day I might want to take advantage of the fact it can be outdoors. Those are all pretty standard these days, but with Wi-Fi 6 now on the rise, there’s still room for improvement. All the APs will be used indoor. Unless you really want the 4x4 for some reason. My question is do I need 1 or 2 APs for my house. The Nano is really meant for ceiling mounting but can be installed on-wall if it makes sense for the space. ... My logic of buying the UDM Pro apart from the obvious bargain was that I was a Unifi Video user and basically Ubiquiti clamped my balls into vice and stuck a bunsen burner under it given their announcement about retiring video.

FlexHD will be particularly eye-catching for residential use, as its form-factor is better suited to resting on a tabletop. It does look like a cool product though.

You have three In-Walls or three nanoHDs? Is it because of the antenna or the shape of the AP itself? I have a small two story house with basement and found that it just wasn't optimal to use a single access point for all three floors. They don’t have to be on the ceiling. I have both and they work good.

Leading the way is 802.11ac Wave 2 technology that is backed by 4×4 MU-MIMO connectivity. Trying to get signal through the floor can be tough. Best WiFi system design for large house with FiOS Gigabit. That has worked perfectly for me in my situation. FlexHD vs nanoHD real world comparison. Comparing the specs, it looks like the noticeable difference is the Antenna Gain at 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz. I was planning on building my little network with a USG and UniFi switch, but am town on the access point. Planning to buy 3 APs and was wondering if there any advantages of using FlexHD vs NanoHD. I have three in my home and they work great.

The apartment is pre-wired with Cat 6 to each room, totaling 5, 2-termination outlets in a 2-bedroom apartment. However, when UniFi introduced UniFi Protect and the UniFi Dream Machine, both devices got replaced by their newer and more performant counterparts. Applicable to UniFi devices such as Access Points (UAP) and Switches (USW) that are adopted by the UniFi Network Controller. Now for the official release, it’s down to $179. With flexible mounting options, the Flex HD can be deployed on tabletops, walls, poles, and ceilings. Currently have a house with 2 Nano HD access points and AP AC Pro. Advice is needed please :). Does that mean that the FlexHD performs worse than in 2.4ghz but better at 5ghz? I can't any performance difference between the two.

Currently have a house with 2 Nano HD access points and AP AC Pro. Your email address will not be published. Is it Router??? If you need better coverage outside get one of these UAP-AC-M-US. the same apart from different antenna design - but I'm sure there are some differences in performance.I recently got the nanoHD, I've tried all kinds of different positions but the signal is pretty disappointing just one floor below, so I'm thinking about sending it back and trying the flexHD instead. The nanoHD will power up happily without PoE+ so the cost of adding not-so-cheap PoE+ adapters or replacing a whole switch with an almost universally overpriced PoE+ model. The pattern you need really depends on the use case. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Are early access products pretty much finished products? Press J to jump to the feed. The UniFi AP Flex HD access point has a small, sleek design and compact form factor that can easily be deployed indoors or outdoors.

Only getting 30% of ISP Promised Internet Speed? Would a circular AP have better range? UniFi nanoHD Access Point The UniFi nanoHD is a compact 4x4 MU-MIMO 802.11ac Wave 2 dual-band access point with an aggregate radio rate of over 2 Gbps and supports over 200 concurrent users. $175-200 is a bit much imo, considering the 2.4ghz issues and iffy chipset.

My two nanoHDs are installed on the ceiling in bedrooms at opposite ends of a 3800 sq ft 3 floor house. [Low Voltage] Outdoor powerline adapters? Required fields are marked *. Does anyone here own both the FlexHD and nanoHD? I can't tell the difference between the performance. The only things missing are 160MHz (VHT160) mode, (which for most people won't matter), and DFS channels - presumably to come later. 2 megabits per second vs. 100 megabits per second on the patio. I really need to know whats a better purchase -- specially right now the NanoHD is cheaper by $25. I’ll let you know what I find. Right now, the NanoHD is selling at $155 vs $180 of the FlexHD.

When Ubiquiti first debuted the access point, it carried a $199 price tag. UniFi Wi-Fi 6 Lite, In-Wall, Long Range, Mesh, and Extender.

I have an option to ceiling mount or even mount it on a wall -- so either of the two is good. I have basically treated those two and the UAP-IW-HD as equals. UniFi switches give you greater functionality when used with the different UniFi Access Point (UAP), UniFi Dream Machine (UDM), and UniFi Security Gateway (USG) models, and cost well under the amount of the midspan device alone. If you're wanting more signal a floor below try putting it on the ceiling towards the center of the structure and then measure with Wifiman on your Android phone. I have the power set to low and working with know issues. I'm pretty sure the NanoHD will have the better range but haven't tested the FlexHD to test that theory. I have great coverage all over the house. I have both and I find the performance to be almost identical between the two.

Listing off the specs from the UniFi FlexHD, you’ll find it compares quite similarly to the existing nanoHD access point. Subscribe to the 9to5Toys YouTube Channel for all of the latest videos, reviews and more! Do the new in wall HDs they have the same antennas as the nano HD’s which I think are the best APs available now from Ubiquiti. Did you see any difference on performance between the two at all? Or just in general? I do like the nanoHD access point, but I do not have access to routing any cabling in the walls which means above-wall cabling and that is kind of an eyesore. This AP supports 300Mbps on the 2.4GHz band and 1733Mbps on … Only having a more home-friendly design already sets itself apart.

Finally get frustrated with poor coverage on the patio and replaced one of my floor mounted Nano HDs with the Flex HD. It’s a replacement for the UAP-AC-Lite, and it’s currently in the early access store for $99.Since then, they also added Wi-Fi 6 replacements for the AC-IW-HD, UAP-AC-LR, BeaconHD, and UAP-AC-Mesh I am now torn between a fully released product (nanoHD) and a "tester" product that can just sit on a counter and look sleek. FlexHD = 2.4 GHz for 2.4ghz and 4 dBi for the 5ghz. There’s a ceiling mount kit for the flex that hides a portion of it in the ceiling, I was considering that for our upstairs, but the flex starts more expensive than the Nano, and the ceiling kits another $15-$20; so I will likely just get the Nano.