You can try any plan risk-free for 30 days. Become a member and get unlimited access to our massive library of Webster (plaintiff) brought suit against Califano (defendant), administrator of the Social Security program, in federal district court on the grounds that the statutory scheme privileging women was unconstitutional. A summary and case brief of People v. Webster, 814 P.2d 1273 (1991), including the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, key terms, and concurrences and dissents. This website requires JavaScript. On appeal, Webster asserted that the trial court erroneously allowed King’s prior inconsistent statements to be used as impeachment evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 607. The holding and reasoning section includes: v1480 - ff5894fcf61f3aca55b897d91273896664d8705b - 2020-10-09T12:09:59Z. The SSA considered the earnings of males between 1950 and whenever they reached age sixty-five, while it considered the earnings of females between 1950 and whenever they reached age sixty-two. You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Under § 215 of the Social Security Act (SSA), old-age insurance benefits were computed based on a wage-earner’s average monthly wage minus his or her lowest years of earnings during a specific period of employment. Webster was convicted and appealed his conviction to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. united states v seeger quimbee R. 45-46. Webster claimed that prosecutors’ use of impeachment by prior inconsistent statement under Rule 607 should be limited to when the prosecutor is surprised and harmed by the witness’s testimony, regardless of the prosecutor’s good faith in offering the testimony. No contracts or commitments. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

Rule 607 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Here's why 404,000 law students have relied on our case briefs: Are you a current student of ? practice questions in 1L, 2L, & 3L subjects, as well as 16,500+ case The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. The operation could not be completed. briefs keyed to 223 law school casebooks. A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section; A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and. No contracts or commitments. Quimbee might not work properly for you until you. Then click here. Until a 1972 amendment to the SSA, this period of employment was treated differently for males and females. If you logged out from your Quimbee account, please login and try again. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc. Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. You're using an unsupported browser. Webster was convicted and appealed his conviction to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. briefs keyed to 223 law school casebooks. Then click here. The operation could not be completed. Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it.

reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc. Clinton Webster (defendant) was charged with aiding and abetting the robbery of a bank. If not, you may need to refresh the page. No contracts or commitments.

Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

). Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it. To impeach King, the prosecutor introduced King’s prior inconsistent statements to the FBI in which he inculpated Webster. You can try any plan risk-free for 30 days. Read our student testimonials. The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion. united states v booker quimbee law school study materials, including 726 video lessons and 5,100+ briefs keyed to 223 law school casebooks. Read more about Quimbee. This website requires JavaScript. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings, or use a different web browser like Google Chrome or Safari. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee. The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. Before calling King to the stand, the prosecution (plaintiff) asked the court to allow the prosecutor to conduct a voir dire examination of King outside the presence of the jury because she did not know what King’s testimony would be. Even after Nosal and his associates quit Korn/Ferry and set up their own business, they persuaded an ally still on the Korn/Ferry payroll to … At Webster’s trial, the Government offered the testimony of the bank robber, King. The holding and reasoning section includes: v1480 - ff5894fcf61f3aca55b897d91273896664d8705b - 2020-10-09T12:09:59Z. United States v. Booker Case Brief - Rule of Law: It is in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury to allow a judge to enhance a sentence. Quimbee might not work properly for you until you. If not, you may need to refresh the page. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. On appeal, Webster asserted that the trial court erroneously allowed King’s prior inconsistent statements to be used as impeachment evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 607. law school study materials, including 735 video lessons and 4,900+ You can try any plan risk-free for 7 days. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee. Cancel anytime.

No contracts or commitments.

Read more about Quimbee. Here's why 404,000 law students have relied on our case briefs: Are you a current student of ? If you logged out from your Quimbee account, please login and try again. King then gave testimony that exculpated Webster. The statements were admitted, and the judge instructed the jury that the out-of-court statements were to be considered for impeachment only and not as substantive evidence of Webster’s guilt. Get Califano v. Webster, 430 U.S. 313 (1977), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. This resulted in a slightly higher average monthly wage computation for females, which translated to slightly higher old-age insurance benefits for females than males. law school study materials, including 735 video lessons and 4,900+ The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings, or use a different web browser like Google Chrome or Safari. The district court held that § 215 of the SSA violated the equal protection component of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and Califano appealed to the United States Supreme Court. You're using an unsupported browser. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school. The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.