More posts from the techsupport community, Stumped on a Tech problem? There is evidence to suggest that its benchmarks are kind of designed to make Intel's cpus look better. Question. What kind of GPU? Close. 1600 or 2000 series have pretty good nvenc - better than cpu really as long as you aren't already hammering the gpu with the game. My first question … Be sure to check out the Discord server, too! tf2 doesnt take much to run. I play and stream a lot of Team Fortress 2. The Ryzen 7 2700 (both x and non x) are a lot better for anything that uses a large amount of cores and threads. Userbenchmark is not really that accurate. Or is there something up with my CPU/OS that's making is use more than neccesary? Even if I switched to a 2080 ti, there would be barely any/no difference to TF2 performance on my rig. I have a 2700 and exclusively record/stream on my rtx2070. https://discord.gg/2EDwzWa, Press J to jump to the feed. Although the 2700 has 2 more cores and 4 more threads than the 8700k, the 8700k was initially more expensive, although to be fair they are like a year apart. If we wish to have good performance and max core & thread support, then the 2700X processors are our pick. share. Alright so, I currently have an i7 8700k and my friend has a Ryzen 7 2700 (non x) I play and stream a lot of Team Fortress 2. But, both products have different benefits in their own way. There are a lot of debate on Ryzen 7 2700X VS I7 8700K topic. Ryzen 3700x vs intel i7 10700k. 11 comments. Log … Just on a technical basis after looking at this Cinebench single threaded and multithreaded test results I would easily select the Ryzen 7 2700X processor. 100% Upvoted. Posted by 1 month ago. On average TF2 uses anywhere between 20-30% of my CPU when playing. 2. Question. Plus, it is budget-friendly price tags for users to develop content creation. However his usage is way less than that, it's like 40-50% total. Intel will likely be same or slightly better if you are playing older games that only use 2 or 3 cores kinda thing and have a good OC on it. So is CPU UserBenchmark just innaccurate, and is the 2700 just way better at x264 encoding than the 8700k? Yes I'm very aware that other applications in the background affect CPU usage, but nothing according to task manager shows to be using much in my case (and the usage is like sub 10% with TF2 and OBS not running/streaming). So, if we prefer to have good warranty support, high–quality performance and … Alright so, I currently have an i7 8700k and my friend has a Ryzen 7 2700 (non x). According to it, the 8700k is supposed to be 11% better at workstation tasks than the Ryzen 7 2700. 2700 will be better for modern games that use 4 or more cores if you are streaming at the same time. TF2 is a CPU bound game and uses pretty much just a single core of my 8700k.I'm only running a GTX 960 4GB actually, but that's only because I play TF2 literally 99% of the time.

My OBS settings are exactly the same as my friend for streaming TF2: When streaming TF2 on these settings with my 8700k, my usage is around 80-90% total. Ryzen 3700x vs intel i7 10700k. Ask the tech support reddit, and try to help others with their problems as well. save hide report. We know that Puget's testing showed the i7-8700K ideal for AE with its single threaded architecture. Which one is a better in your opinion for a 1500-1800 dollar pc. My first question relating to the main question down below is how accurate is https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/ for comparing CPU performance in terms of the percentage ratings for gaming, desktop and workstation? Is this true? Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts.